MENU
roboto flexroboto serifmulishinterarchivogeoramavartaheebopublic sansmanropecatamaranassistantdosisoswaldroboto slabbittermanualedominepiazzollafaustinaloranewsreaderalegreyagrenze gotischcinzelimbuetruculentayanone kaffeesatzsairainconsolataplayfair displaykreonpetronacabinencode sansexoralewayjostcommissionerdancing scripthahmletyrsarasasource sans 3besleymurechobodoni modaibarra real novanoto serif displaysource serif 4STIX two textinter tightliterataspline sans mono

Mulish

Weight range 200-900
Class = italics

Mulish (£12gIl&@%? fi fl)

Mulish (£12gIl&@%? fi fl)

Mulish (£12gIl&@%? fi fl)

Alan says, "Mulish—clear individual letter-forms, italics, and mono-spaced numerals. This one is a winner!"

A real-time patho-physiological simulator with embedded ANNs (artificial neural networks). A work in progress.

This page (apart from the header and footer) is rendered using a single variable typeface - "Mulish". Mulish, as with all the fonts implemented on this page, is impressively clear at small sizes and keeps an attractive shape with decent kerning throughout the weight-range. Google will serve an equivalent range of non-variable fonts to those browsers that do not support variable-fonts. Mulish should be suitable for information-dense web pages containing multiple areas of formatted text: paragraphs, tables, etc. This paragraph is normal width at a weight of 400. This sentence has class "bold" causing a relative increase in weight. A full, print-friendly, font.
Numerals: vertical alignment & character spacing / kerning 1234567890
£1,111.11 |
£8,888.88 |

Some tiny text light LIGHT @ 300. Some small text MEDIUM-LIGHT @ 300. Some big text MEDIUM-LIGHT @ 300. Some big text MEDIUM@ 400. Some heavy text HEAVY @ 700. The heaviest weight available: HEAVIEST. JET5 And in italics. JET5

Varying width (---)

Some text goes in here (narrow)
Some text goes in here (wide)

OK, here's some experimentation with CSS for tables and interface elements. All light-on-dark for an extra challenge in legibility! (weight 300)

I guess the basic question is: can you do a professional-looking website using only a single variable font? (weight 600)

Top Left
Cell 1

Cell 2: 2px padding, tiny font & whole cell is clickable!
Cell 3. Let's pad this one to 8px, add a rounded border and some text—and see how well it works (all cell clickable).
Bottom Right
Class = small (font size)

Button 1
Button 2
  1. One
  2. Two

And the answer is definitely! And that website will be faster because of the reduced overall font-file size, bandwidth, and memory requirements.